News & Updates
Plan View of Proposal
Hamann Park Neighborhood
Congested Traffic Studies for Hwy. 17
Lines, Lines. Lines at In-N-Out
Safety Issues – Schools & Pedestrians
Other Cities Say NO!
Too Many Fast Food Restaurants
Petition and Forum – Info & Results
Sign the Petition
CONTINUING PROGRESS REPORT
section will be updated continually as
information becomes available.
Citizens for Sensible Growth has joined
United Neighborhoods of Santa Clara County
September 19, 2018
We want to work with other towns and neighborhoods and share our ideas to make Santa Clara County a better place to live and work, and to talk about important issues that affect all of our surrounding towns. We have joined the United Neighborhoods of Santa Clara County (UNSCC) to better serve the needs of our community. Visit the UNSCC website at http://www.unscc.org/ for more information about their work.
Stay tuned for more information about this important relationship!
Good News from Environment Impact Review (EIR) July 24 Public Scoping Meeting
The result of the scoping meeting session at Campbell City Hall on Tuesday, July 24 2018 was very favorable to the position of the Citizens for Sensible Growth, which opposes the proposed In-N-Out development at the old Elephant Bar location at Hamilton and Almarida in Campbell.
In addition to a number of residents who voiced their opposition on the basis of traffic congestion, CFSG also provided comment on some of the deficiencies and errors in the Final Traffic Impact Study (TIS). City of Campbell Planning Commission members noted severe congestion issues, citing findings from TIS that predicted Level Of Service (LOS) FAIL (F) at the critical intersection at Salmar and the southbound ramp at Hwy. 17. Traffic hazards, such as weaving, and congestion on city streets and nearby intersections were also raised as serious concerns by Commission members. (See links below to view a video of the Scoping Session meeting.)
There was press coverage by KPIX (Channel 5), the Bay Area News Group, and SF Gate – see below for links to these news stories. The KPIX News video from July 26 strongly substantiates our CFSG position regarding traffic congestion and is very worthwhile viewing. The Bay Area News Group article came up a bit short on facts but generally substantiates of our position. There is also a supportive article in SG Gate, although it slightly misrepresents the figures on the City website – analysis of this data shows that 70% of respondents are firmly opposed to the In-N-Out project.
Links to stories, videos, and documents:
Final Traffic Impact Study (TIS)
May 16, 2018
The FINAL Traffic Impact Study has been released. You may view it by clicking here.
There are no substantive improvements to the draft TIS, with changes primarily limited to editorial corrections to text and tables.
HIGHLIGHTS of the TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY:
- The Hwy. 17 southbound off-ramp/Salmar intersection is projected to be a "FAIL" (Level of Service "F").
- Because that intersection is LOS F, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required. (The City has issued a Request For Proposals (RFP) for the EIR, with responses/bids due Monday, April 16.)
- The study predicts that neighborhood streets in Hamann Park will not be significantly affected. (We disagree, and data from a professionally-conducted TIS Peer Review agrees.)
- The study recommends that the Hwy. 17 southbound off-ramp be widened with the addition of an additional lane. (This was also recommended in a 2004 TIS for the Kohl's development, but never funded.)
COMMENTS and OBSERVATIONS
- There appear to be deficiencies and omissions in the Traffic Study.
- Traffic Study counts at many key intersections and neighborhood streets were collected at the wrong time of day and/or for an inadequate period of time.
- There is no supportable justification in the Traffic Study or in City documents (dating back to 2004) that widening the Hwy. 17 southbound off-ramp would reduce traffic congestion at key intersections. It might make it worse!
- The traffic counts for neighborhoods were too small a window of time and on incorrect days to reliably predict traffic. There is no qualitative assessment – cars speed over the speed bumps at 50 miles per hour, blow through stop signs, and drivers throw trash on our streets. We live in these neighborhoods and W-Trans does not.
Process Briefly Explained
January 10, 2018
are a number of studies and reports that the City of Campbell Planning
Department require. These include the Traffic Impact Analysis, Site Plans,
Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and Architectural Review. (Click on
CFSG - City Campbell Meeting Minutes 9-12-17 Final.pdf for a more complete
description of the required permits and processes.)
the City of Campbell Planning Department has received all relevant reports
and studies, it will assess the information before forwarding the data and
recommendations to the City of Campbell Planning Commission. A public
hearing shall be scheduled once the Community Development Director has
deemed the application complete.
addition, a Conditional Use Permit is required for this location. There are two primary condictions that require approval. They are:
1. Late hours (after 10:00 PM).
2. Drive-thru Restaurant.
any these are disallowed, the application, as filed, is denied.
Planning Commission consists of seven appointed citizens who will decide by
simple majority whether the In-N-Out proposal will or will not be
approved. Any decision by the Planning Commission may be appealed by any
party to the five-member elected City Council who, by simple majority, will
make a final decision.
If the Planning Commission's
decision is for application approval, Citizens For
Sensible Growth WILL appeal the decision to City Council.
that by City law, either In-N-Out or a residential or commercial property
owner within 300 feet of the proposed In-N-Out development may file legal suit
to challenge a final decision by City Council. Property owners may only
file suit on the basis of issues that they have raised with the City prior
to the close of public comment.
and Discussions with Public Officials
CFSG has met with a variety of
Public Officials and City Staff to discuss our issues and concerns.
Public (elected) Officials and their position on the In-N-Out application.
Our committee has called on the following politicians in our area to get
their feedback: Contact these politicians to make your voice known.
Ken Yeager, Santa Clara County Supervisor: Against
(click here to download Ken Yeager' s letter).
2. Chappie Jones, San Jose Councilmember, District 1:
Jason Baker, Ex Campbell Mayor: Against (verbal).
4. Evan Low, California State Assembly: Against,
waiting for his formal statement.
5. Jim Beall: Has cancelled
our meeting due to scheduling changes.
Campbell City Council
that City Council members may not indicate how they may vote on an appeal.
1︎. Mayor Paul Resnikoff: Met with him.
2. ︎ Vice Mayor Rich Waterman: Met with him on several
3. Jeff Christina: He requested a meeting with us. We
met with him for over 2 hours.
4. Susan Landry: Met with her on several occasions.
5. Liz Gibbons: Met with her once.
City of Campbell Staff
Campbell Planning Department: Daniel Fama, Sr.
Planner, and Paul Kermoyan, Community Development
• September 12, 2017 (see CFSG - City Campbell
Meeting Minutes 9-12-17 Final.pdf).
• November 08, 2017.
Campbell City Manager: Brian Loventhal.
Updated September 19, 2018 | Website Administrator – Charles Drew